Tips for Saving Money

I'm not particularly good at managing money, mostly because it's been so tight for as long as I can remember, that there hasn't been much that I could actually choose how to spend. But when hard times came knocking (hello, unemployment!), I found there were still ways to stretch those pennies further.

Security Enhanced Piggy Bank

Switch to the 'basics' foodstuffs range of your chosen supermarket (in my case, Sainsbury's), rather than the 'premium'. Some are rather mediocre quality – the coffee is too acid for our taste, the toilet paper is so thin it's not cost effective – but most are just slightly smaller than the regulars (Scotch eggs, tinned tomatoes, biscuits, chips). Cuts of meat can go either way; some end up in basics only because they're poorly cut, others have so much fat and/or gristle that the actual meat on them comes off as more expensive than more 'deluxe' ranges.

Use those loyalty cards and vouchers. I hardly ever go into a shop where I have no card to swipe these days. Nectar points are flexibly redeemable; they can stretch the grocery budget or buy gifts and little luxuries that one wouldn't afford otherwise.

When you find an offer, buy in bulk. This is ideal for non-perishables, and only storage space is the limit.

Upgrade your home insulation. We've just jumped at the opportunity to have British Gas do both the loft and the wall cavities for free. It can make a great difference to the heating system's efficiency, not to mention the utility bills!

Shop around for a good phone/internet/TV package. We are with Sky, and get HD satellite TV, unlimited broadband and essentially free landline calls (including abroad) for much less than each one would cost separately.

Consider switching to a pay-as-you-go mobile phone and a prepaid credit card, so charges will depend entirely on usage.

Plan outings around establishments' happy hours, which can reduce the bill greatly. If I bother to take the family to the Harvester before 5.30pm, we'll pay 1/3 less than after.

Entertainment doesn't have to cost a fortune. Not with libraries, book swap clubs, DVDs coming out hot on the heels of theatre releases, digital downloads available at bargain prices, and the option of entertaining at home.

Use cash as much as possible. You can't rake up an overdraught when there's nothing more in your wallet to spend. Seeing exactly how much you have allows more efficient rationing.

Don't mope. Whether it is a temporary thing, to weather some hard times, or there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel, bemoaning your fate and feeling deprived all the time gets depressing and can very easily lead to some overindulgence, just to drive the blues away. I've been there. It's more effective to consider it lifestyle-building. Just like building new lifelong habits is a more effective weight loss tactic than a crash diet.

After all, the way we spend each day ends up being the way we spend our lives.

Powered by Plinky

The Best, for Less

Sandwich bars don't have a reputation for being posh eateries. Swing by an Everest, though (they're all over Greece), and you won't care about posh again. Too delicious for nitpicking.

Chachi’s Sandwich Bar

Everest redefined the tradition of the 'quickie bite', taking it from cheese and spinach pies and sausage rolls (greasy and occasionally dodgy) to full meals, with a lot of room to go healthy and with more than decent prices. Where else can you get a filling meal, a dessert and a drink, and still keep the bill in the single digits?

There are traditional-style pies and ready-made cold sandwiches, to be sure, but the great strength of Everest is the completely customisable toasted sandwiches. Basic white bread rolls, but the choice of fillings is entirely up to the customer's whim, and I all staff have had to deal with some pretty daft combinations. I'm not sure if I've ever had the exact same sandwich twice myself, and believe me, I've had hundreds. (Nothing better after a night of clubbing, to keep the post-drinking munchies at bay.)

In more recent years, they have introduced customisable salads as well – pick a (sealed) bowl of greens – spinach and rocket, or a medley – and add your choice of extras and dressing. I used to have a lot of such salads for dinner when I worked evenings. Spinach and rocket, with roast chicken fillet chunks and honey-mustard dressing, or with red beans, sweetcorn, diced peppers and a vinaigrette. If I was extra hungry or it had been a particularly nasty day, I could add a slice of carrot or marble cake. And their 'chococaramel con panna' (hot chocolate with caramel syrup and whipped cream) was comfort in a paper cup in any but the hottest weather.

My husband, who was not yet my husband at the time and enjoyed ping-ponging emails with me during the hours of low activity in the evenings, never stopped being bemused at how little I had to pay for my dinners, compared to how many things I piled into either my salad or my sandwich. All until he came to visit and had the experience himself. It is really the only way.

I miss Everest. I haven't been to one since August 2010, and I plan to indulge fully when I find myself in Athens again.

Powered by Plinky

Pay Me to Do What?

Hobbying for a living? Maybe, maybe not.

I’ve heard a lot of horror stories about people getting to do their absolutely favouritest thing in the whole world for a living and finding out that it no longer is as much fun any more – not when it involves, like any other job, deadlines, dealing with the tax offices, collaborating with others of different mindsets or simply being unable to take a break.

That’s why I don’t think I’d want to write for a living, much as I love writing. To clarify: I’d love to be able to sell my writing well enough to live on the proceeds, but turning out creative writing or research on a deadline? That would kill my fickle muse deader than a doornail. I tried to get a journalism scholarship once; the trial involved simulating the task of a rewriter in a busy newsroom. I’ve come to be glad that I didn’t get it.

I wouldn’t want to dance for a living either – I’m insecure enough about money as it is, I don’t need the constant worry about when I’d land another gig. Teaching yoga is fine as a volunteering activity, as well, but I don’t think I’d want the issues with other people’s injuries that could get blamed on me, nor the inability to take a break if I was injured myself.

All this doesn’t mean I consider myself cursed to spend my life doing something I don’t really care about, just for the paycheck. There are plenty of jobs having to do with books, after all, that are so congenial that I’d feel vaguely guilty getting paid for them. None of them would make me a fortune, but all would be time well spent.

Selling books. Why not? Retail hours can be brutal, but… I used to pray so hard for an opening at our local independent bookstore. I could very happily sit in their vault-like basement, with all the fantasy books and the new age paraphernalia, till the cows come home. I’d have no trouble smiling to customers, because every person who comes in and buys a book is a kindred spirit. Reading at work, promoting literary events (NaNoWriMo!), being the first to know what’s coming out, getting to meet authors I devour and walking away with my own autographed copies. Bliss.

Librarian. No, nothing to do with the sexy librarian stereotype, and none of your business whether I can carry it or not. I don’t mind learning Dewey and rearranging shelves, as long as I get a quiet environment that allows me – you guessed it – to read and write on the job. And rifle the clearout bins for freebies, too.

The publishing business is where I want to end up, eventually. Proofreading and copy-editing are right up my alley, indulging both my meticulous and my creative sides. Letting me influence what a finished book will look like. Getting me credited for being involved with a book’s creation, even if I’m not the actual author.

Book reviewing is the one area of journalism that I wouldn’t mind ending up in. Getting paid to read (free) books, and my opinion being read and considered. What a boost to the ego that would be.

So ‘scuse me while I go pick up my proofreading course again. Gotta be as ready as possible by the time the young master is old enough for school and frees me to seek gainful employment again.

One With a Million

I don’t know anyone who doesn’t want to be a millionaire, but what they can do with the dosh depends largely on the monetary unit. You can bet your bottom banknote of choice.

monopoly money

I’ve been a millionaire, through the famous avenue (the game show, not the lottery). A double millionaire, if you must quibble, because I won two millions, but since it was back in the days when Greece had drachmas, the concept was not nearly as glamorous as it sounds. Less than a year later, the country entered the euro zone, with an equivalency of 340 drachmas per euro, which translated my earnings into just under 5,900 euros. Hardly a fortune, when you look at it like that, and it’s no wonder that it was gobbled up supplementing the unemployment benefit over three summers.

I remember a roadie at a certain metal concert, back in those days, approaching a bunch of us, waving a dollar bill in front of us and saying, ‘This is real money, not like the Greek stuff, which looks like Monopoly money.’ Greek banknotes might have looked like that, colourful as they were (50 dr = blue, 100 dr = red, 200 dr = orange, 500 dr = green, 1000 dr = brown, 5000 dr = grey-blue), but in fact dollars are the only western currency that is not colour-coded by denomination, plus the new Monopoly money, the euro, has given the green stuff a very serious run for its own dear self, so there. Poetic justice.

Now, what would I do if I had a million in real money? The question, hackneyed as it is, is always about dollars, but I’m going to buck the trend again. After all, right now one euro is 1.3 dollars and one pound goes up to 1.5 dollars. Since this is dream money, I’m going for the stuff that goes furthest. One million pounds sterling, please… that would make a big pile of blue and red notes, for sure.

It doesn’t sound like much, does it? Compared to my current non-existent disposable income, though, a whole million to myself feels like too much to even contemplate, and it would be quite enough for what I have in mind. I’m not particularly good with money, I admit it. I can keep hold of it, but I don’t have the knack to make it grow. Investments are beyond me, so I suspect that some clever saving would be the furthest I’d go.

First things first: a house or two. 100 grand towards a down payment for a bigger house here in England. The sale of the current place would pay it off, so no more mortgages to bleed us dry, and a few hundred more into our monthly budget. Another 200 grand for a flat in Athens. That would have to be paid in full, but it would give us a place to stay whenever we visited and would relieve my mum of the hassles of renting (both the payment and the fear of being asked to move).

700 grand left, and some charitable sharing is in order. As I read in one of my favourite books, Claire Nahmad’s Earth Magic, ‘when your ship of fortune docks, make sure others share in the cargo, at least a tenth part, or you will end up worse off than before’. And I’d be generous, because I’ve been too strapped to really give as much as I’d want for a long time. 100 grand to good causes in the UK and another 100 in Greece. My charities of choice have to do mostly with children, and the Greek budget could well go all to Child Smile, which supports both abused and terminally ill children and their families. Some of the English budget, though, would have to go to my local parish, which is housed in a historical chapel dating from Norman times, and St Helena Hospice, which is losing its MacMillan funding at the end of the year. No hospice should have to close; pain is a part of life, but it shouldn’t be the last thing one feels, nor should one need to trade human warmth and dignity for relief.

There’s still half a million there, and it’s time to secure my son’s future. 200 grand set aside would pay for his education; right now I plan to send him to Catholic school and hope he turns out bright enough to get into grammar school, but I’d like to be able to send him to a good private secondary school, if he doesn’t make it to the (bloody selective) grammar school. Even with that, there should be enough to see him through university, or even some postgraduate work, if he’s anything like me.

And even after that, there’s still 300 grand left for me to do as I please with, which means setting aside enough to pay for my theology studies in Cambridge (currently just over 10 grand) and putting the rest in the bank, choosing a savings plan that yields the best interest rates possible, and taking out that interest and a little of the capital each year as disposable income. That’s all. I’m not interested in expensive purchases or pastimes, and I’m happy with my modest life. I might buy myself a diamond or two, and a pair or two of Jimmy Choos, just to satisfy a long-standing hankering for something I could not afford, but I don’t care to, say, dress in top to toe Armani for the rest of my life. I’d much rather go for little luxuries that would make my daily life easier, like getting a cleaner a couple of times a week, outsourcing the ironing, calling a taxi whenever I need to go somewhere with the young one… and, dream of dreams, having private ballet lessons.

Above all, that kind of money would relieve my family of a lot of stress and worry, thus improving the quality of life of everyone in the household. So yes, money can’t buy happiness, but it can bloody well help… and one doesn’t need silly amounts of it, either.

Powered by Plinky

Family, Revamped

Legislating family matters: You’re doing it wrong.
I promise, we did not adopt a child…

I thought long and hard before even pointing at legislation I’d want changed. Everyone thinks they can legislate better than the specialists themselves, and sometimes they’re right (because legislators are only human themselves and what looks like a good idea at a time may very well turn out to be a big mistake). But nobody can be right on everything, so I felt I had to pick my battles and concentrate on one primary cause.

Being the kind of person who wants to do right by everything and everyone, that was very hard. It’s incredible how much effort it needs to say, ‘This is an admirable cause, but it is not my cause.’ But if I had to choose only one law to reform, it would have to be the criteria for adoption.

The issue is close to home, because I could have had to deal with the adoption nightmare myself, having remained childless until the age of 35 and thus not knowing if I would ever be able to have biological children. The ordeal of an acquaintance, who was denied on grounds of age when she was barely past 30, only compounds my interest. Both she and I are lucky: she fell pregnant with twins soon after she gave up all hope, and I had my gorgeous boy without a hitch at 36. Not everyone is like us.

I feel that prospective adoptive parents are grilled way too harshly on issues of finances, health, and age. The vast majority of children are born into families less than financially stable (really, who is financially stable today? not even the filthy rich, it seems). People fall ill, even with life-threatening conditions, and an orphan is in the same predicament whether biological or adoptive. Additionally, I do feel that there are extremes in the realm of biological parenthood – teenagers simply don’t have the necessary resilience, physical, mental, or emotional, to bring up children, and the menopause is a sign that the childbearing years are over, not a cue to go for IVF – but the restrictions imposed on prospective adopters are ridiculous. With more and more women waiting until after 30 to attempt a first pregnancy (ironically, in order to be more financially secure), it makes no sense to deny them the right to adopt if nature won’t cooperate.

And don’t even get me started on the hoops a single parent or a gay couple would have to jump through in order to adopt. Most of them would be denied even the chance to foster.

I’m convinced that, if all one needed in order to adopt was a job, no potentially fatal pre-existing health conditions, a healthy age difference between adopter and adoptee (dictated by the societal trend of the time), and, okay, a partner as well, I can give you that, because single parenthood is not a walk in the park… well, then there would be much less bureaucracy and fewer abortions, geriatric IVFs or surrogacies, all of which strike me as – to varying degrees – unnatural. Not to mention it would cut right through the illegal paid adoption industry – because without the law’s support, people will just go outlaw.

But then I’m a simple woman who would, in all probability, have been turned down as a poor old hag, what do I know?

Powered by Plinky

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.